The year 2008 will go down in infamy for many retirement portfolios as substantial losses have many wondering if they can afford to retire on time. However, many are wondering just how bad their situation is compared to those of their peers. Well, we found the data and here it is:
- $200,000+ portfolios lost more than a quarter of their value.
- $100,000 - $200,000 portfolios lost about 21% of their value.
- $50,000 - $100,000 portfolios lost about 15% of their value.
- $10,000 - $50,000 portfolios broke even for the year.
The trend is clearly that larger portfolios lost a larger portion of their value while smaller portfolios tended to outperform. In fact, investors who had less than $10,000 in their accounts in January 2008 saw their balances increase by an average of 43% between then and January 2009!
Why does this trend exist? Well, the average diversified stock fund fell about 38% in 2008. Even bond funds – which are considered safer than stocks – dropped nearly 8% during the year. Large 401(k)’s tend to invest in these types of stock funds and bonds. Meanwhile, smaller investors tend to invest in individual stocks, which can be riskier but can also pay off handsomely in a market like that of 2008.
So, how does this affect retirement? Well, a recent study showed that baby boomers with 20 to 29 years on the job may have to work an extra year and nine months to boost their portfolio balance to where it was a year ago. Moreover, if these people move into more conservative investments, it may take even longer to recoup the losses…